the necessity of acedia

                                                                                    

    Lo naturale è sempre sanza errore,
ma l’altro puote errar per malo obietto
o per troppo o per poco di vigore.
    The natural is always without error,
but the other may err through an evil object
or through too much or too little vigor.
    —Dante, Purgatorio, Canto 17, 94-96

“To love is to risk not being loved in return.” This slogan, sometimes traced to Leo F. Buscaglia, or credited to Rollo May, proliferates in self-help manuals, many of them cast in a religious mold. Therein lies a contradiction. If God is love, he cannot but love every man. Then, if to love is to risk not being loved in return, it follows that men cannot love God for want of risk of not being loved by Him.

Nothing in this rebuttal depends on the meaning of is. If God is love, the inference goes through with the copula being interpreted as a relation of identity, predication, or belonging. It might be argued that in loving God man runs the risk of not being loved in return, in the event of His non-existence. But it is implausible that love—unlike its collateral attitudes such as fear—could be predicated without presupposing the existence of the lover and the beloved alike. There is something wrong with our homiletic premisses. Love does not require the risk of not being loved in return. Or else, God is something other than love.

5 thoughts on “the necessity of acedia”

  1. В исполнении О. Басилашвили

    Если хочешь, чтоб тебя любили,
    Не люби сам никого…

    1. Re: В исполнении О. Басилашвили

      Как первым заметил Спиноза, Богу всё и вся похуй.

  2. “ואהבת את ה’ אלוהיך בכל לבבך ובכל נפשך ובכל מאודך” (דברים ו).
    מהות האהבה היא: “כלות הנפש ונטיתה בעצמה אל הבורא, כדי שתדבק באורו העליון” (ראשית חכמה, שער אהבה פרק א).
    Nothing is said there essentially about reciprocality, i.e. god loving man. It is man’s duty to love god for no reason, but for his wish to participate in the divine light.

    1. The Hebrew Bible is conspicuous by its absence from Benedict’s encyclical. I doubt that any Jewish theological authorities would identify God with love, or predicate love for each man as His essential attribute. Sure thing, God loves the Jewish people to pieces, but His is a tough love that seldom reaches them as individuals. That kind of love is a Christian thing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *