the advantages of sodomy over orthogenitalism

Methinks the homophiles are protesting too much by resolving to ignore the obvious charitable reading of Justice Scalia’s insistence on submitting law to moral scrutiny. Consider that their most compelling current jurisprudence calls for equal protection of homosexuals as distinguished by immutable characteristics of their sexual preferences. Suppose that tomorrow, psychiatrists declare the preferences of coprophagia, apotemnophilia, or kleptomania to be equally immutable. Would it be reasonable to demand that restaurants served excrements on par with conventional nutrients; that surgeons be compelled to amputate healthy limbs on their owners’ demand; or that bankers and shopkeepers surrendered their stock to anyone organically beholden to the advantages of theft over honest toil? Might it not make more sense to submit equal protection to moral judgments? Anyone who thinks this far-fetched is welcome to contemplate the immutability of schizophrenia as grounds for mandating equal treatment for its patients.

5 thoughts on “the advantages of sodomy over orthogenitalism”

  1. Whose moral?

    “Methinks the homophiles are protesting too much by resolving to ignore the obvious charitable reading of Justice Scalia’s insistence on submitting law to moral scrutiny.”

    I don’t necessarly disagree.

    But according to what or whose moral standard?

          1. Re: Whose moral?

            “Not big on ethics, those two.”

            Now, you have finally something in common with those liberal! That is their biggest complaint about the two.

            In fact, I became interested in those two due to Western Civilization 101 that I read (and obviously written by a typical liberal professor) denounced those two for embracing ‘anti-intellectualism’.

            Btw. I don’t agree everything, in fact, at least in economics, I disagree with them sometimes.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *